Costs and decisions

How to compare concrete quotes

You have three quotes, three formats, three prices and no way to line them up.

Most homeowners compare quotes by looking at the totals. That works only if the quotes describe the same job, and in concrete work they usually do not.

The productive approach is to normalise the scope first — get every bidder describing the same set of items — and compare afterwards. Almost every large price gap explains itself during that process.

Get every quote to state the same items

For replacement, that means: area, excavation depth, base material and compacted depth, slab thickness, reinforcement type and placement, control joint spacing and depth, finish, curing method, disposal, and what is excluded.

For lifting: which panels, target elevation, method, expected material volume, what happens if more is needed, hole patching, and what the warranty covers.

For resurfacing: preparation method, crack treatment, system and thickness, number of coats, and warranty exclusions.

Ask for anything missing in writing. A contractor who will not put the specification in writing is telling you something.

Where the gaps usually are

Base preparation depth. Slab thickness. Whether disposal is included. Whether drainage work is included. Whether the apron or a transition area is included. Warranty scope. Those six items account for most large differences in residential concrete quotes.

None of them are visible in a total.

Reading the warranty rather than the length

A ten-year warranty that excludes settlement, cracking and anything caused by ground movement covers very little of what actually goes wrong. A shorter one that covers workmanship and the specific failure mode you are worried about is worth more.

Ask directly: if this settles again in two years, what happens? The answer is more informative than the headline number.

The non-price signals worth weighing

Did they look at where water goes? Did they explain what they think caused the problem? Did they mention an option that would earn them less money? Did they tell you anything you did not want to hear?

Those are the signals that separate a contractor who is diagnosing from one who is quoting.

Getting it all in one document

Ask each bidder for their quote in writing, with the specification on the same page as the price. Two separate documents — a number by email and a specification described on the phone — is how disagreements start, because there is nothing to point at afterwards.

Where a contractor is willing but disorganised, sending them your own list of the items you want stated is usually enough, and most will fill it in. That is what the estimate checklist on this site is for.

On suspiciously low bids

A bid far below the others is not automatically bad, but it is always worth understanding. The usual explanations are a thinner base, a thinner slab, no disposal, no permit, a narrower warranty, or a scope that quietly excludes part of the work.

Occasionally it is simply a contractor with lower overheads or a gap in their schedule. Ask, and see whether the answer is specific.

Common questions

Should I always take the middle quote?

No — that is a heuristic standing in for the work of understanding the quotes. Once the scope is normalised, the middle quote often stops being the middle one.

Is a deposit normal?

A reasonable deposit is common in this trade, particularly where materials are ordered for a specific job. A very large upfront payment before any work begins is worth questioning, and payment terms should be written down before work starts rather than agreed verbally.

Work it out, or judge the quote

Not sure which way to go?

Both decision tools are free, need no contact details, and take a couple of minutes. If you would rather talk to somebody local, you can ask us to look at matching you.